Why Private Investment Works & Govt. Investment Doesn't



From transportation to energy, and everything in between, should the government invest money in as many promising projects as possible? Or would that actually doom many of those ventures to failure? Burt Folsom, historian and professor at Hillsdale College, answers those questions by drawing on the fascinating history of the race to build America's railroads and airplanes. Donate today to PragerU: http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h Do you shop on Amazon? Click https://smile.amazon.com and a percentage of every Amazon purchase will be donated to PragerU. Same great products. Same low price. Shopping made meaningful. VISIT PragerU! http://www.prageru.com You can support PragerU by clicking here: https://www.classy.org/checkout/donation?eid=60079. Free videos are great, but to continue producing high-quality content, contributions--even small ones--are a must! FOLLOW us! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/prageru Twitter: https://twitter.com/prageru Instagram: https://instagram.com/prageru/ JOIN PragerFORCE! For Students: https://www.prageru.com/student-ambassador-program For Educators: https://www.prageru.com/educators Sponsor a Student: https://www.prageru.com/become-pragerforce-sponsor Script: In 2011, a solar power company called Solyndra declared bankruptcy. A company going bankrupt is not news. But Solyndra was not just any company. Its biggest “investor” was the federal government which had given it $500 million dollars. That was news. But, really, it shouldn’t have been. If history is any guide, it was quite predictable. The government is a very poor investor. And always has been. There are countless examples, but two should serve our purpose here. After the Civil War, American leaders were anxious to bind the country’s North, South, East, and West regions together with transcontinental railroads. Congress therefore gave massive federal aid to build the Union Pacific, the Central Pacific, and later the Northern Pacific Railroads. But all three of these roads had huge financial problems. The Union Pacific, for example, was mired in financial scandal from its inception, went bankrupt several times, and had to rebuild large sections of track thanks to shoddy construction practices. At that same time, James J. Hill, with no federal aid whatsoever, built a railroad from St. Paul to Seattle -- the Great Northern. How was Hill able to do with private funds what the Union Pacific failed to do with a gift of tens of millions of federal dollars? The starting point is incentives. The Union Pacific was paid by the government for each mile of road it built. It was in the railroad’s interest not to build the road straight. The more miles it took the UP to cross Nebraska, for example, the more money it made. Hill, by contrast, used his own capital. To make a profit, he had to build his Great Northern Railroad sturdy and straight. Hill’s company remained in business for almost a hundred years until 1970 when it merged with other railroads. The original Union Pacific, riddled with corruption and numerous other financial misdeeds, including the wholesale bribery of public officials, went broke within ten years. The story of the airplane is even more stark. By the opening of the twentieth century, the major nations of Europe and America were frantically at work trying to invent a flying machine. The first nation to do so would have a huge military and commercial advantage. In fact, leading American politicians of the day, such as Teddy Roosevelt, President William McKinley, and others argued that building an airplane was a national emergency. There was no time, they argued, to wait for private industry to get the job done. The government needed to pick the best aeronautics expert and give him the money he needed. That expert was Samuel Langley, the president of the prestigious Smithsonian Institution and holder of honorary degrees from Harvard, Yale, Oxford, and Cambridge. Langley was already an accomplished inventor and he had written a highly praised book Experiments in Aerodynamics. Federal officials gave Langley funds for two trial flights. He immediately set to work. His theory was that his plane needed to be thrust into the air from a houseboat on the Potomac River. The big engine on the plane would then propel it through air for several minutes. When his first attempt failed, and the plane splashed into the river, Langley was not deterred. But when his second flight did no better, Langley and the politicians gave up. If Langley, with the full backing of the government, could not solve the problem, people simply assumed that it could not be solved. Indeed, The New York Times wrote that human flight might take a million years to accomplish. For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/courses/history/why-private-investment-works-govt-investment-doesnt

Comments

  1. well maybe your government just suck at building stuff? like look at china >>
  2. i mean, i suppose people not spending money properly may be a reason why government investment can be inefficient sometimes, but the claim that it "never works", is in NO way supported by two examples, one of which doesn't even seem to be related to the funding at all.. "someone wasn't able to crack the mystery of human flight on the government dollar, therefore anything funded by the government will fail", like wtf, that's your actual reasoning? its a joke honestly...
    dumb tunnel minded video per usual.. . . .
    watching heavily right minded videos created to prove left ideas wrong is like watching a retarded animal flail around in a cage screaming... its entertaining, but also a little sad and scary. . .
  3. On of the things I have noticed is that the government interferes with privately own business regulating them and telling them how things need to be done, Health and safety and HR departments but Government run businesses I fine are never checked up on or interfered with guidelines.
  4. cough cough Amtrak
  5. the government invested in 63 different solar companies 8 filed for bankruptcy including the one you use in this video. why not celebrate the fact that 55 companies that are still around today but you want to focus on the 8 that failed and one in particular.
    if a baseball team at the All-Star break was 55 & 8 that team would be celebrated.
  6. I'm building a time machine. I need small government funding of 1 billion dollars.
    the time machine must be located in the basement of my mansion.
  7. how much 💰 did Langley get from the government?
  8. So basically, whenever government invests in any one company, the company goes corrupt and steals money. thinking thinking thinking thinking people are lying assholes. If private investors do something today, they focus on using as little money as possible, but gain as much profit as possible. And so they make shit products (or toxic products, just look at your food industry America!), gain profits and people suffer. On the other hand, if the government invests, the people that are being invested in eventually start stealing the money because its hand given to them, and like a spolied child, it will expect more and more while it lies (or tries to lie) its way out of a mess. In conclusion: Capitalism doesnt work because greed is everywhere! Neither investation works today. But i think i have a solution. Raise your children better, so that they work because they WANT TO, not because they think that they NEED TO. (for example, is a child that wants to go into literature really happy while studying IT?)
  9. Love this video and how true it is. To all the triggered liberals practically bitching for sources, GO ON THEIR WEBSITE. They have all their sources there. I can't believe liberals are too lazy to simply click the link for the full transcript and then click on the sources. ITS LITERALLY TWO CLICKS!! And then they have the nerve to say that "liberal channels have sources for their arguments" Oh really? Lets see if Vox, the most liberal argument channel, has sources...


    WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT!??? they DONT!!! and a whopping 1.5 million more subs than PragerU.

    Why don't you go on there and ask for sources? Exactly, because you just want to make every, even slighly right-leaning channel look bad.
  10. Thank you professor. Well said.
  11. the Wright brothers flew one junky airplane, and then spent all of their time suing anyone else who tried to build an airplane. they built several more models but planes like the Curtis Jenny overtook it by leaps and bounds. The only accomplishment they should be credited for is the first controlled flight, but in all reality seeing them as "the fathers of flight" is ridiculous.
  12. While I gave this a thumb up, there are certain dangerous endeavors with which private investors won't deal. Think NASA. Or projects that are just so big, no private investor has the wherewithal. Think Hoover dam. So while I am no fan of big gov, there are areas where government involvement is appropriate. Space-X wouldn't be here without the investment and the technology NASA developed 50 years ago.
  13. Hey guys, how do I spell cherry picking? I love picking cherries but sometimes it's just so hard to tell people about it...like I see cherries being picked, and I want to say something - it's just ....right there...so close.... but then I have no idea how to spell ''cherry picking''...... I wish I knew
  14. Interesting, but that is not a rule. Paraguay (before the war) was a really well country, with a State controlling the Economy and making investiments
  15. Thinking about f35s
  16. And how does government investment works so well in scandinavia? Everybody has healthcare, free excellent education and the best services. I support free market but government is very necesary as well. In USA there is so many poor people (being a very rich country) because extreme capitalism... NO PURE CAPITALISM AND OBVIOUSLY NO PURE COMUNISM BUT A BALANCE POINT IS THE IDEAL SYSTEM
  17. Liberals need to know that word.
    incentive. INCENTIVE!
  18. what about China ?
  19. In sweden we have the reverse problem. Used to be the state would be responsible for maintaining and running railroads. but now the job goes to the lowest bidder and they have no interest in paying for rail maintenance.


Additional Information:

Visibility: 682021

Duration: 5m 54s

Rating: 7698